I couldn’t see a single benefit of using such a heavy approach. I was deeply unimpressed – I thought it was a weird, over-engineered solution to a non-existent problem. I remember reading the original GitFlow article back when it first came out. It certainly _is_ everywhere for me personally – practically every project at my current job uses it, and often it’s the clients themselves who have chosen it. GitFlow is probably the most popular Git branching model in use today. Implementing OneFlow on GitHub, BitBucket and GitLab OneFlow – a Git branching model and workflow
That’s all I got.This post is part of a series of articles on working with the Git source control system.įollow-up to 'GitFlow considered harmful'
The one-line summary: don’t rebase a branch unless you are the only one who uses it. You can read more about the proper way to rebase here: The Golden Rule of Rebasing. Imagine trying to resolve this kind of conflict on a real-life, larger scale project.
Not immediately obvious how to sort this out.Įven with our dead-simple project, it would take a little effort and brainpower to figure out how to resolve the discrepancies. Notice the inconsistencies between our branch (bold) and Mark’s copy (blue). The master branch, our rebased version of the feature branch, and Mark’s copy of the feature branch. Think of it like a redo - “I meant to start here.” Rather than merging master’s new commits into feature, we opt to rebase our feature branch onto master.Īt a high level, rebasing can be understood as “moving the base of a branch onto a different position”. We need to get it just right - this change affects 50% of our codebase! But before we continue working on our feature branch, we decide we want to bring in the latest changes from master to keep things fresh. Let’s rewind, and pretend that we instead wanted to keep working on styling the letter ‘b’ - maybe change its size, font, color, etc. As an added bonus, when merges are reserved for these major changes, the merge commits act as milestones that others can use to figure out when these major changes were incorporated into the project. Large refactors and major feature additions are good candidates for separate feature branches that can later be merged into master. Use merge for cases where you want a set of commits to stand out. Avoid branching and merging when only making minor tweaks or trivial bug fixes. To avoid this pitfall, try to use merges purposefully and sparingly. Difficult to decipher, but at least the colors are pretty… Image Credit #19- 14 Patterns to Ace Any Coding Interview QuestionĪn extreme example of merge-mania.#18- How to Hack Facebook Accounts: 5 Common Vulnerabilities.#17- The Metro Games in Chronological Order: A Postapocalyptic Masterpiece.#16- Here's How To Fix Your Ethernet If It's Not Working.#15- The Batman Arkham Games in Chronological Order.#14- KAFKA Says: It is Likely That The Consumer Was Kicked Out Of The Group.#13- 5 Best Pokémon GO Hacks and How to Get Them.#12- The Ace Attorney Timeline: All Phoenix Wright Games in Chronological Order.#11- Apple CarPlay Not Working? - Here's How to Fix Common Issues.#10- 3 Best Kotor Builds Even Vader Would Approve of.#9- What is the Impact of Quantum Computing on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency?.#8- Spray, Pray, and Go Away: Investing is an Art.#7- Startups That Help Construction Companies.#6- Git Branch Naming Convention: 7 Best Practices to Follow.#4- What Is Yield Farming? The New Age of Decentralized Finance.#3- How to Use DeepAR For AR Effects on Amazon IVS Live Streams.
Avalanche Launches New Contest With $32K in Prizes. #1- The Objective Need for Decentralization: Reality Consensus.The DeSci Guide: Is Decentralized Science the New Web 3.0 Trend?.Bootstrap CSS is Still the Sh*t But We Can Make it Better.Let's Look at BattleFly: A Competitive Play-to-Earn Strategy Game.Independence! And All the Tech Companies in Between.